Marashlian examines the evolving regulatory landscape and its implications for the VoIP industry. The article aims to spark crucial dialogue around the question:

"Is it time for VoIP providers to reconsider the perceived advantages of avoiding Title II regulation?"

The regulatory landscape for Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) providers has reached a critical juncture. Our latest Tele-Tech Talk article, "VoIP and Title II – '(Almost) All of the Burdens, None of the Benefits'," written by Jonathan Marashlian explores the growing challenges faced by VoIP companies in today's complex regulatory environment.

Here are some highlights from the article:

• VoIP providers are increasingly burdened by regulations resembling those of traditional telecom companies, without the legal protections of Title II common carriers.
• The recent Smartbiz Telecom case exemplifies VoIP providers' vulnerability to multiple regulatory frameworks, including state-level enforcement.
• VoIP companies navigate a minefield of federal and state regulations, facing heightened compliance burdens and legal risks.
• The industry faces a dilemma: continue in the current regulatory "briar patch" or push for formal Title II classification?
• A call for regulatory reform to create a more balanced framework that recognizes the unique nature of VoIP services.

This thought-provoking analysis by Jonathan

For more information, plesae follow the link below

https://commlawgroup.com/2024/tele-tech-talk-voip-and-title-ii-almost-all-of-the-burdens-none-of-the-benefits/